Suit Strength Texas Holdem
Poker hands from highest to lowest 1. Royal flush A, K, Q, J, 10, all the same suit. The strength of a flush is determined by the highest value card you hold in that suit, with an ace being the highest. If you hold A-Q diamonds and the flop comes 7-9-2 all diamonds, then you have an ace-high flush. After the flop, if you’re looking for one more card to.
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
Hand Strength
forTexas Holdem, Omaha
Poker games. Apart from this i am alsoworking on Pot creation and Rake calculation
part. It would be helpful if anyone could contribute some logic or algorithms.- Optional 'thank-you' note:
Kapish M Joshi wrote:Can somebody suggest me a good algorithm to calculate Hand Strength
No, because it isn't really an algorithm: it's an ordered list; and 10 seconds on Google got me this. If I was doing this, I'd probably consider using an Enum to define it though.
Apart from this i am also working on Pot creation and Rake calculation part. It would be helpful if anyone could contribute some logic or algorithms.
Again, the 'Pot' isn't really an algorithm; it's a structure - basically a List with methods for providing totals - and I reckon it's probably closely related to the Players at the table.
As for Rake calculation, you'll have to explain the term before I can help. Not a gambler.
Winston
'Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow' - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
Appreciate your help. Thanks. Yeah, http://www.pokerlistings.com/poker-hand-ranking this is actually the pattern that should be considered while calculating strength of cards.
For E.g. Consider simplest logic, If I am playing Poker Hand and
I got 5 cards as - 2♥ 7♦ 4 ♣ A♠ A♥,
Next person got 5 cards as - 5♥ 2♦ Q ♣ K♠ J♥,
here every card has a weight say 2♥- 23, 7♦ - 67, 4 ♣ - 98, A♠ - 122, A♥ - 109 then we have to create total and then compare both hands. The one with more weight wins the hand.
This is not really as simple as even i thought because there are millions of combinations possible with a hand (5 cards taken from a deck).
I am trying to implement this using pattern recognition, but that too is very lengthy.
Pot - yeah Pot is winning total at the end of poker hand, its not algorithm but we need to write some logic to calculate pot because:
1. Poker game can have number of Hands
2. Each Hand will add to the value of pot
3. Bets of each player will contribute to pot
4. Pot distribution depends upon the percentage of amount contributed by particular player to total pot amount
5. There can be one or more than one pot winners
I am done with the logic creation part for this.
Rake - Its the amount deducted from player whenever he bets some amount on table. It is the pivot of gambling where revenue generation happens. Can't disclose about it in details.
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
Winston Gutkowski wrote:
Kapish M Joshi wrote:Can somebody suggest me a good algorithm to calculate Hand Strength
No, because it isn't really an algorithm: it's an ordered list
I don't that's what he's going for...
In standard Texas Hold 'Em, everyone is dealt two cards face down. there is a round of betting. You have to decide if to bet, and how much to bet, based on the two card. So being dealt a suited A-K is clearly going to be better than a non-suited 10-9. And an unsuited 2-7 is the worst possible starting hand.
But even at that...your position at the table also has an impact. If you are in an early position, you need a stronger hand if you are going to bet, whereas if you are on the button, you can bet with weaker hand - depending on what everyone else does.
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
It can be done in any of several ways:
A fee to join the tournament
A percentage of each pot
A fee charged to the 'dealer' on each hand
Some online services charge a monthly fee (i.e. a subscription), but then play is 'free' beyond that
etc..
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
- 1
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
Kapish M Joshi wrote:here every card has a weight say 2♥- 23, 7♦ - 67, 4 ♣ - 98, A♠ - 122, A♥ - 109 then we have to create total and then compare both hands. The one with more weight wins the hand.
Doesn't sound right to me.
First: the problem is complicated by the fact that you're choosing the 'best 5 of 7' (actually: Player's 2, plus the best 3-of-5 from the flop, turn and river).
Second: Any 'weighting' will only apply to:
(a) The value of card involved in making up two similar winning hands.
(b) The remaining cards of two identical winning hands.
I am trying to implement this using pattern recognition, but that too is very lengthy.
And possibly over-engineering. You only have 9 possible hands (10 if you count 'High Card', but personally I'd say that that's the absence of any other kind of hand) that fall into 3 categories:1. Flushes - 5 cards of the same suit.
2. Straights - 5 cards in value sequence.
3. Multiples - 2, 3, or 4 cards of the same value (including full houses).
Online Texas Holdem
so I'd make those your first checks.I'd also do them in the order above because in 'vanilla' form, that's the order they're ranked. And unless you're playing from a multi-deck shoe (unusual, from what a gather), it also eliminates the most possibilities:
Which Suit Is Highest In Texas Holdem
Are those same 5 cards (or a particular set, if there's more than one combination to choose from) ALSO a straight?
Computer Texas Holdem Free
With a multi-deck shoe, it's a bit trickier, but still relatively straightforward. The main difference is that if you find a flush; the 7 cards could ALSO contain 4 of a kind or a full house.
HIH
Winston
'Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow' - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
fred rosenberger wrote:I don't that's what he's going for...
Oh, OK. I was thinking of weighting in terms of final evaluation. Seems to me that weighting (especially by card) probably isn't the way to go for evaluating a hand (or, more accurately, a 'situation'), since there are so many other variables - including the 'weight' that you might put on any previous bet placed, particularly if the game involves 'blinds'.
Winston
'Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow' - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
Kapish M Joshi wrote:Thanks Winston...The knowledge you shared was really helpful.
No probs. Too much late night TV. I've never actually played the game.
Winston
'Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow' - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here
- 1
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
If you're developing a poker playing artificial intelligence or if you're just curious you may want to look into starting hand strength from a strategic standpoint. As was pointed out, in texas holdem an ace and a king is a better starting hand than a two and a seven. One way to determine this is by running both hands through an equity simulator, which is a program that runs hundreds of thousands of different possible boards out that allows you to get a pretty accurate estimate as to which hand wins more often. Then you can run each hand against each other possible hand, determine an average equity and then rank the hands accordingly. There are two great free programs out there that do this already:
PokerStove
ProPokerTools
Its still however, ultimately a matter of strategy that determines what the best hands are and not programming since there are different betting streets and different player psychologies.
TwoPlusTwo is a great strategy site that also has a programming forum.
- Optional 'thank-you' note:
ANyway have you looked at bill chen formula, that is very easy to convert into an algorithm. Il also try and find the site i used, it was a points scale basically, which would tell me whether i should raise or fold..etc..etc.. not sire if that what your lookign for.
Texas Holdem Poker
posted 8 years ago- Optional 'thank-you' note:
Playing pocket Queen Jack Off suit and Queen Jack Suited in Texas Hold'em Poker.
Both QJ and QJs are playable hands in many situations in both limit Texas holdem and in no limit Texas holdem. However, they must be played with control and the understanding that they can be trap hands. Most of the profit from these hands will come from straights, flushes and two pair or better hands. These hands are very vulnerable when you just make a pair. It is often likely that one of your opponents may be holding an AQ, AJ, KQ or KJ, so if you hit just a pair and any of your opponents are showing too much aggression, it is best to get away from the hand.
- 888 Casino
100% Up To €140
Rating
4.1/54.3/53.8/54.1/5
- Superior Casino
250% Up To $/AU$/€2500
Rating
4.2/54.1/54.2/54.2/5
- King Billy Casino
100% Up To €/$200 + 200 Casino Spins
Rating
4.0/54.4/53.5/54.0/5
Early Position
I don't play either the QJ or QJs from early position in no limit Texas holdem, but I will occasionally play QJs in limit Texas holdem. Only when the table is passive and fairly loose, is this a good idea. If there are many raises before the flop, it probably isn't a good game to play QJs from early position in.
Middle Position
In limit holdem, you can play both QJ and QJs from middle position in most games if there hasn't been a raise from early position. I still fold them the majority of the time to a raise, but it does depend some on the playing style of the raiser. In most games, it is likely that you will have at least one caller behind you and then you will not have great position throughout the hand. You want to avoid being sandwiched between aggressive players with marginal hands like these.
I tend to fold QJ from middle position almost all of the time in no limit holdem, but if there has been no aggression from early position I may enter with a raise with QJs. When I do this, if I am re-raised from late position, I fold. Do not play these hands in no limit holdem from out of position against a raise. You are very vulnerable and can lose a large pot and can be forced into difficult decisions.
Late Position
Both the suited and non-suited hands can be played from late position, unless there has been aggression from one of the early or middle position players. If it has been folded around to you, you should enter the pot with a raise. QJ and QJs fair very well against two random hands in the blinds. You still must be careful with these hands in no limit Texas holdem, but you will have the advantage of acting last.
Blind Play
Suit Strength Texas Holdem
If the pot hasn't been raised, you should call in the small blind with both hands. I recommend folding in the small blind to a raise, unless the raiser is weak, but I often call a minimum raise in the big blind, especially with the QJs. Once again, remember that you will be playing the rest of the hand out of position, so if you have a questionable decision you should lean towards a fold.